Speak with a criminal defence lawyer early.647-983-6720
Chartersample

Section 8 searches — what makes a stop "arbitrary"

The line between a lawful investigation and an unreasonable search under s. 8 of the Charter — and how it plays out in drug and firearms files.

By Mandeep Saggi7 min read

Placeholder draft. Replace with reviewed content before publishing.

Every drug and firearms file starts with the same question: was the search lawful? Section 8 of the Charter guarantees the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure — and where police cross that line, the remedy under s. 24(2) can be exclusion of the evidence.

The reasonableness test in a sentence

A search is reasonable when it is authorized by law, the law itself is reasonable, and the search is carried out in a reasonable manner. The Crown bears the burden of establishing each element.

Common flaws we look for

  • Warrant applications built on stale or unreliable informants.
  • Traffic stops that morph into investigatory detention without grounds.
  • Consent characterised as free when the surrounding circumstances suggest otherwise.
  • Searches that exceed the scope of what the warrant authorised.

Why it matters

Excluding the evidence — the phone, the search, the seized substance — often ends the case. That is where much of the real work in drug and firearms defence lives.

✆ CallConsultation